Legal Aid

April 16, 2018

How land surveyors cheat to avoid allocating land to veterans

How land surveyors cheat to avoid allocating land to veterans

As promised, today we are going to tell you about various tricks the officials use to avoid allocating land to the ATO veterans. The material reflects personal experience of the lawyer who has been engaged in the veterans’ matters for a number of years. Read the story told in his own words.


Once our veterans’ group came up to the KyivZem stage in our papers processing. Briefly speaking, at this very moment following filing a request for allocating along with all corresponding appendices, a number is assigned to the case (it starts with K letter which stands for “application” or “request” in Ukrainian, so people call these “K-shka”). The cases bearing that “K-shka” numbers are transferred to the KyivZem where they get into the hands of a land surveying clerk of the corresponding district. His task is to examine the request, develop a plan of the plot that a citizen is applying for, and issue his or her conclusion. Naturally, if the land surveyor’s verdict is positive, it substantially increases the chances for successful passage of the application through the next stages – both KyivRada’s land committee’s ballot and KyivRada itself. The positive conclusion usually reads in the following way: “the filed request corresponds with all town planning norms”. Negative verdicts largely vary in options, and as far as we understood, their variations are countless and can be freely invented or “adjusted” to any reasons. This means an experienced land surveyor can draw a negative conclusion to literally any application, even if it is a totally correct one!

Unsurprisingly, all our applications then got negative conclusions. There were various inconsistencies indicated there, still the majority of requests featured the same problem: the plots’ borders got mixed with their adjusting ones. Why, you can ask? We started digging into it, and found the following thing. While filing an application, a citizen has to attach the plot’s mapped location. In reality, it looks like an ordinary sheet of paper with a survey map printed on it, where you need to outline the corresponding plot you are applying for, with a green pencil. Still the matter is, in reply to our appeal to provide us with the survey maps containing our prospective plots, the clerks gave us large-scale – that is non-detailed – cadastral maps which made precise plotting impossible due to very small size of the plot.

Can you see the tiny red dot against green background in the right upper corner? It is the plot our veterans have to outline in the survey map

A land surveyor’s task is to arrange these maps in the way that each plot would perfectly match with the adjoining areas, communications, roads and green zones not conflicting with these in boundaries. Well here is where the clerk has certainly succeeded! It turned out to be that all the plots somehow overlapped their adjoining ones! How this come? Quite simple: suppose a specific plot our ATO veteran is applying for, is 0.23 acres. According to the law he is entitled to no more than 0.25 acres – this looks quite fine as his plot is even lesser than a norm. Still in the survey map drawn by a land surveyor, it turns out that his plot “has grown” up to 0.26 acres and, logically, its limits overlap the adjacent plots. Instead of exact outlining of the veterans’ wishful plots in his survey map he just copied shapes of the figures delineated by marker on a large-scale cadastral map!  And then simple geometry followed: the 0.26 acres’ plot just cannot go within the 0.23 acres of free land! Having cheated on veterans like this, the land surveyor immediately sent all the applications along with his negative conclusions back to KyivRada’s land committee.

When the veterans learnt about this trick, they got rather angry, to say the least. Unable to resist their evenhanded reasoning, the land surveyor agreed to process all the applications properly, to avoid overlapping the plots’ perimeters. The ATO vets had to file new requests for re-processing their papers in the land committee. Still there they had to face a new session of bureaucracy! As being a subject of request, only KyivZem possesses the right to withdraw the applications. This was the point we learnt from the land committee’s response. Time was lost again, so when we managed to get senior officials (who used to be every time absent due to either sick leave, meetings or some other unknown reason), and forced them to draw a letter of withdrawal, the land committee had already processed our applications and, logically, issued negative verdicts on each of them. Accordingly, we had nothing to withdraw anymore, so had to start everything over again.


Hopefully our story will enable those ATO veterans who will apply for land plots on their own, to avoid the alike troubles. In our turn, we address everybody who cares about the 171 veterans to whom we are trying to provide legal aid in obtaining the free land guaranteed by the law: dear friends, despite their previous unsuccessful experience in struggle against the bureaucratic machine, despite their numerous attempts to get their papers processed, now they are aided by a skilled and experienced lawyer who has been guiding them through the circles of bureaucratic hell. So the funds we are raising within the Legal Aid project, will be allocated to pay for his work. Dear friends, please support the initiative: it would be exceptionally nice to set such a useful precedent, wouldn’t it?

Comments

Altogether on the project

Legal Aid

26 people

donated

20 764 UAH (751 USD)

of 90 000 UAH (3 256 USD) needed

23% raised

Updated 13.03.2018 at 13:18
Share on Facebook
Mykolaiv regional charitable foundation “BLAGOCHESTYA regional fund”

License of state registration of сharitable organization №736456 from 26.09.08

Requisites of the project Legal Aid

PrivatBank for UAH transfers

Mykolaiv regional charitable foundation “BLAGOCHESTYA REGIONAL FUND”
PC CB PrivatBank
SREOU: 36143302
MFO: 326610
Account: 26003053236888
Description: charity donation for ‘Legal Aid’ project

SWIFT-transfer in USD

Beneficiary: Mykolayiv Regional Charitable Foundation “Regional Foundation Blagochestya”
IBAN­code: UA803266100000026009053209659
Account: 26009053209659
Beneficiary address: UA 54000, Mykolaiv, Buznyka str. 5, 118
Beneficiary bank: Privatbank
50, Naberezhna Peremogy Street, Dnipropetrovsk, 49094, Ukraine
Swift code: PBANUA2X

Intermediary bank: JP Morgan Chase Bank, New York, USA
Swift code: CHASUS33
Correspondent account: 001-­1­-000080
Description: Charitable donation for ‘Legal Aid’ project
or
Intermediary bank: The Bank of New York Mellon, New York, USA
Swift code: IRVT US 3N
Correspondent account: 890-­0085-­754
Description: Charitable donation for ‘Legal Aid’ project

SWIFT-transfer in EUR

Beneficiary: Mykolayiv Regional Charitable Foundation “Regional Foundation Blagochestya”
IBAN­code: UA413266100000026009053206287
Account: 26009053206287
Beneficiary address: UA 54000, Mykolaiv, Buznyka str. 5, 118
Beneficiary bank: Privatbank
50, Naberezhna Peremogy Street, Dnipropetrovsk, 49094, Ukraine
Swift code: PBANUA2X

Intermediary bank: Commerzbank AG, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Swift code: COBADEFF
Correspondent account: 400886700401
Description: Charitable donation for ‘Legal Aid’ project


Press about us

  • Новинарня
  • UA:українське радіо
  • UA|TV
  • 112 Україна
  • Радіо Свобода
  • УКМЦ
  • Український тиждень
  • Головне управління розвідки МО України
  • УНІАН
  • Ліга.НОВОСТИ
  • Depo UA
  • Інтер
  • Українська Правда
  • Styler РБК-Україна
  • 5 канал
  • Обозреватель
  • Новое время
  • ЦЕНЗОР.НЕТ
  • Bloomberg
  • FOX NEWS
  • Forbes
  • thequardian
  • 1+1 media
  • ictv
  • Украина
  • Еспресо TV
  • Громадське
  • НОВИНИ 24
  • “ЧАС”
  • zik
  • Журнал Житомира
  • СЕГОДНЯ.ua
  • ain
  • ZN,UA
  • delo.ua
  • inforesist
  • NEWSru.com
  • О.П.А.D
  • Вчасно
  • СОЦПОРТАЛ
  • Укрпогляд
  • tribuna
  • cimic
  • комсомольская правДА!

Partners